Robert Baratheon replaced Aerys II Targaryen as King of the Seven Kingdoms, but Ned Stark had a chance to seize the Iron Throne several years earlier. game of thrones – and I have to wonder if he would have been a better ruler.. Robert’s Rebellion ended with Robert usurping the throne, but was too injured in the battle with Rhaegar Targaryen to ride to King’s Landing and defeat the Mad King himself. Ned Stark took Robert’s place, and he and his forces, with the help of the Lannisters, overthrew King Aerys II.
in game of thrones, Jaime Lannister recalled that Ned could have taken the Iron Throne for himself, but did not. This caused a big problem.What if” at the beginning of the series, leaving viewers wondering what would have happened if Ned had claimed the Iron Throne instead. Of course, Robert Baratheon had a better claim since he has Targaryen blood, but Ned and Jon Arryn did not. However, while Robert was not the worst king in the history of Westeros, he was lacking as a leader. Ned could have done a better jobhowever, he had some significant flaws that Robert did not have.
Ned Stark would have been more interested in the verdict than Robert Baratheon
He would have had more responsibility as the king of the Seven Kingdoms.
Although Ned did not desire the Iron Throne like Robert, he was probably more interested in his duties as king. And that already suggests that he would have done a better job than his old friend. game of thrones emphasized the fact that Robert had fallen into viceswould rather drink and succumb to debauchery than actually serve the kingdom. Although Robert commanded fear and respect from his subjects, he did not have heavy-handed authority over the government. He left many of the day-to-day decisions to the people who worked for him.
Although Robert’s reputation was greater as a warrior than as a king, he benefited from the relative peace that his subjects experienced under his rule.
Although Robert’s reputation was greater as a warrior than as a king, he benefited from the relative peace that his subjects experienced under his rule. However, it is worth noting that Many of the benefits brought about by Robert’s reign can be attributed to Jon Arrynserved as Hand of the King and did what Robert would not do. In this respect, Ned differed from Robert in that he directly assumed responsibility as Warden of the North. This is shown in the first scene, when he claims he will personally behead a Night’s Watch deserter. Ned took his duties seriously.
related
Why Game of Thrones wasn’t titled ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’
HBO decided to call its adaptation of George R.R. Martin’s novel A Song of Ice and Fire by a different name, but here’s how it ended up on Game of Thrones I wonder?
This would extend to kingship if he chose to pursue it, but Ned did not aspire to power. Perhaps that made him better suited. He would have understood the weight of being king and would have taken it more seriously than his friends. That would have put Westeros in an economically advantageous position.However, it may not have suited those who took advantage of Robert’s lack of interest in governance.
If King Ned Stark were there, the king’s debt would be reduced.
Ned didn’t live as extravagantly as Robert and was more cautious.
The royal family has been deeply in debt game of thrones, and Robert Baratheon was unable to resolve the situation.. Actually, from what game of thrones Robert’s revelations about the royal debt to the Iron Bank of Braavos actively exacerbated it. Littlefinger told Ned: game of thrones Season 1,Master of Coin finds money. The king and the hand use it.“Anointing Littlefinger Master of Coin was already a questionable decision on Robert’s part, as he rarely advised the king to be fiscally prudent. However, Robert was wary of frivolous spending. It didn’t seem like it was.”
Ned, on the other hand, would have approached the Treasury with the same caution and sense of duty as with anything else.
Robert enjoyed both luxury and vice, and during his time on the Iron Throne, he held many feasts and tournaments in King’s Landing. Although such a thing was not necessary, Robert was not worried about the consequences of borrowing money from Braavos or the Lannisters. Ned, on the other hand, would have approached the Treasury with the same caution and sense of duty as with anything else. Even when Ned became Hand of the King, He was immediately worried about the king’s debts.. This was a clear indication that he never intended for things to get so out of hand.
Ned Stark wasn’t good at politics.
This may have shortened his reign and caused conflict
Ned Stark would have tried harder to govern responsibly than Robert Baratheon, but that would not guarantee that his reign would be longer or better. When Robert took the Iron Throne, there were too many conspiring factions and they quickly took advantage of the new king. Because Robert was a good-natured man, characters like Littlefinger, Varys, and Grand Maester Pycelle were able to escape political maneuvering while serving Robert. Ned Stark could not have been more kind to any of these characters.since he was not as good at politics as Robert.
Robert was able to keep people like Littlefinger and Varys happy, but Ned would have gotten a knife in his back if he had rebelled against them.
game of thrones Ned was a man of honor and repeatedly emphasized the fact that he had no patience for playing games. It was truly the basis of George R.R. Martin’s entire series. Ned’s refusal to serve the interests of untrustworthy politicians would have been his undoing.Because it was necessary to survive in King’s Landing. Robert was able to keep people like Littlefinger and Varys happy, but Ned would have gotten a knife in his back if he had rebelled against them. This already happened when he became the Hand of the King.
related
R+L=J: George RR Martin’s original Game of Thrones plot makes Jon Snow’s parentage twist more memorable
Game of Thrones’ Jon Snow twist goes back to George R.R. Martin’s original ASOIAF synopsis, which makes it all the more impressive.
As for the great houses of Westeros, Ned probably couldn’t have fared any better, as many lords and ladies came with their own demands. The easy-going nature and ability to compromise that Robert possessed was necessary to avoid conflicts with other powerful forces. Ned’s more black-and-white morality would have backfired herewhich could cause more conflict than Robert had to deal with.
Ned Stark probably had bigger problems that Robert didn’t.
The Lannisters would have been in trouble if Ned became king.
Besides the fact that Ned couldn’t play Game of Thrones as well as Robert. As king he would have faced another obstacle: the Lannisters.. House Starr and House Lannister did not mesh well from the beginning of the series, with the latter only interested in forming an alliance with Robert due to his desire for power. Tywin married Cersei and Robert, allowing him to claim further power for the Lannisters. He wouldn’t have been able to use Ned to his advantage, especially if Ned was already married to Catelyn.
Ned would also have wanted to hold the Lannisters responsible for Robert’s rebellion, and his code of honor would have required that.
Ned would also have wanted to hold the Lannisters accountable for Robert’s rebellion, and his code of honor would have required that. He probably sought to punish Jaime Lannister for betraying his oath to the Mad Kingthat would have infuriated Tywin and Cersei. He may have even gone after Tywin for his own betrayal of King Aerys II, but that wouldn’t have ended well for him. Needless to say, Ned’s honor game of thrones If he had become king of the Seven Kingdoms over Robert, he would have started the war sooner.