[ad_1]
A former Bay Area CEO accused in a lawsuit of enslaving his assistant and sending her into a “dark abyss of unwanted sexual horror” is now the woman’s prominent Hollywood lawyer, who tells her story on celebrity gossip site TMZ He claims that he threatened to take her to the city. He failed to pay her $10 million on top of the money he already paid under her legal settlement.
Christian Lang, former CEO of Tradeshift, a software company he co-founded in 2010, paid a former assistant, identified in court filings as “Jane Doe,” in a legal settlement. is currently at the center of an ongoing legal battle. .
In December, a woman sued Lang, accusing her of forcing him to sign a “slave contract” within months of being hired as an executive assistant at the San Francisco-based company. She claimed that rape, sexual abuse, torture and assault continued over the years.
Tradeshift, which achieved “unicorn” status in 2018 with a valuation of $1.1 billion, is facing a number of lawsuits filed by Mr. Doe after management learned of “serious allegations of sexual assault and harassment” against Mr. Lan. The company announced last week that it had fired him for “serious misconduct for multiple reasons.” he.
This week, Ms. Lan filed a lawsuit with Brian Friedman, a prominent entertainment industry lawyer who accused Ms. Doe of extortion. Ms. Lang’s countersuit also revealed details that were not in the case against Ms. Doe. Before Lunn filed her lawsuit, he had agreed to pay her $10 million in a 2022 settlement to resolve her claims. Doe’s lawsuit mentioned her settlement, but did not specify the amount.
Lunn said in an email Friday that she and Doe had a consensual relationship and that her lawsuit against him was “baseless.” Doe and her attorneys’ claims are “categorically false and directly contradicted by extensive and detailed evidence,” Lang wrote.
In a previous statement to this news organization, Lang claimed that the strained relationship described in Doe’s lawsuit was being used to defame him “for personal financial gain.” did.
In a countersuit filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Mr. Lunn argues that the “slave contract,” filed as Exhibit A in the case against Mr. Doe, “is merely a sex prop downloaded from the Internet and It was originally drafted by Jane Doe in 1993 and was never actually used. ”
In a statement to this news organization, Friedman countered, “If the slave contract was a prop, why would Mr. Lang agree to a $10 million settlement?”
[ad_2]
Source link