Dwayne Johnson’s Underrated $474M Disaster Movie Praised By VFX Artists 9 Years Later

Plans for a sequel are still in development hell, but san andreas A glowing retrospective review from Corridor Crew’s VFX artists. The 2015 film stars Dwayne Johnson as Ray Gaines, an LAFD rescue helicopter pilot who must rescue his daughter after a massive earthquake on the titular fault line causes devastating destruction across the California coast. It depicts him rushing from Los Angeles to San Francisco. Carla Gugino and Alexandra Daddario also star. san andreas Although the film received mixed reviews from critics, it was a commercial success, grossing over $474 million against a production budget of $110 million.

It’s been just over nine years since the movie was first released in theaters. san andreas became the center of attention in the latest episode of hallway crew‘s “VFX Artist React” series. The group can open up by saying the following:cheerful“The movie’s tsunami scene begins with various boats racing across San Francisco Bay and clambering over the waves before the waves crest. Jordan Allen, in particular, said the scene was .” ”enter fast and furious region ” The somewhat ridiculous nature of the action, even when you’re saying “how?”beautiful“The simulated wake is as the boat races up the waves.

Episode segments then show reactions to parts of the scene where the Golden Gate Bridge is destroyed by a tsunami, various cars and people are washed away, and the bridge and suspension cables are distorted by the pressure of the water. . Allen enthuses:eyes are eating well“As for how detailed the effects are, Sam Gorsky said of the scene:Now in the CGI Hall of Fame” and Len Wykman praised Scanline’s VFX.masters of water”Simulation. Although their reviews are generally positive, Weishman points out one overall problem with the film’s tsunami scene. Check out what Weichman and his group had to say in the quotes and videos below.

This movie has an element of unreality, surprise, and amazement. The idea of ​​this movie, “San Andreas,” is that there’s a San Andreas fault line here going north through California, and it’s going to be a big fault. A magnitude 9.5 earthquake or whatever that crazy number is. Such a tsunami will never occur. So someone simulated a tsunami hitting San Francisco, and theoretically, the largest tsunami that could occur in San Francisco is about 16 feet. The tsunami isn’t realistic at all in this movie, but it’s very effective.

What Corridor Crew Analysis Says About San Andreas

This movie had the right mix of improbability and realism.

of san andreas Tsunami scenes aren’t the only disaster genre that Corridor Crew analyzes in the video above. deep impactMr. and the day after tomorrow‘s. However, despite the decades that have passed since the release of the latter two, their opinions have remained consistently positive on all three; Their analysis of The Rock movie actually matches how critics felt about the 2015 title.. The film currently has a 49% approval rating from critics on Rotten Tomatoes, but the audience approval rating is not as high at 52%.

For the most part san andreasCriticism was directed at the film’s implausibility in depicting the devastation caused by the titular fault line, with scientific organizations such as the American Geosciences Institute particularly criticizing the film.last forever[ing] geological absurdity“Beyond the absurd nature of the disaster and the sequence of events, such as sailing a boat directly over a tsunami, The film’s script was also criticized for its underwhelming characters and dialogue.. However, despite public ridicule, san andreas is generally acknowledged to be an entertaining popcorn blockbuster, with critics’ feelings about the film’s CGI echoing those of the Corridor crew.

Accuracy isn’t necessary to make disaster movies interesting

san andreas To be sure, it’s not the only disaster movie to be criticized by critics and scientific experts for its depiction of natural disasters. michael bay’s Armageddon It was infamously rated by Neil deGrasse Tyson as the film that violated the most laws of physics in one minute, but was surpassed by Roland Emmerich’s film. moonfall. Director Emmerich’s previous disaster films have often been questioned about their scientific quality, even if they have received some praise. the day after tomorrowis trying to raise awareness about climate change.

However, accuracy may be valued in certain genres; san andreas This is a key example of why incredible storytelling is acceptable even though the entire movie proves to be entertaining. As a fan of the disaster genre, I really appreciated how visceral the 2015 film was, and how its combination of tongue-in-cheek set pieces and truly horrifying action was mostly successful. meanwhile san andreas 2 While this film may never have come to fruition and builds on the interesting formula of its predecessor, the analysis of teams like the Corridor Crew gives an insight into how effective this film remains even after almost a decade. It shows what you are doing.

Source: Corridor Crew