Even though it consists of three films, there are arguments such as; godfather It’s actually not a trilogy. Francis Ford Coppola’s award-winning film depicts crime boss Michael Corleone and his movements within the Corleone crime family. The first two movies consistently rank at the top of the best movies of all time list, while the third movie is not as widely loved. The entire trilogy became iconic. With its rich atmosphere and deep character work. However, Coppola’s three films employ a method of storytelling that is not typical of a typical trilogy.
The reason is godfather And there’s no doubt that the sequel is so beloved because of its importance in the history of the film industry. Countless films beloved today would not exist without Coppola’s trilogy. Come first. godfather It overshadowed every other crime film of its era and basically mastered the genre in a way that has rarely been replicated in the years since. It was one of the first films to attempt to tell such an epic story over three films, and while it accomplished that feat, the result is very different from the trilogies being created today .
‘The Godfather’ is not a trilogy, it’s one movie and an epilogue
The first two parts are one story
Although it consists of three separate films, godfather A trilogy is best understood as one story and its epilogue. This is exactly how Coppola has described the project over the years, and the filmmaker recently took to Instagram to solidify his position on the debate. He wrote:All I have in mind is The Godfather (parts 1 and 2) and one movie known as The Death of Michael Corleone, which is an epilogue or “coda.”” This is the director’s opinion from when the movie was first releasedbut the final episode’s changed title more simply suits the trilogy.
related
How long did Marlon Brando actually appear in The Godfather?
Although Marlon Brando won the Best Actor Oscar for his role as Vito Corleone in The Godfather, his time in this classic film is surprisingly limited.
From a narrative perspective, it makes sense godfather is considered one story and its epilogue. The first two parts have much more in common than the third, both in setting and characters. Maybe that’s why Part 3 always feels so separate and underwhelming by comparison. The Godfather: Part III The audience was expecting a third part of the story and it didn’t live up to their expectations; Coppola only gave a glimpse of what was to come..
Thinking of The Godfather as one movie and an epilogue makes the series better.
Many of the issues in part 3 have been fixed
There’s a lot of debate on this issue, but here’s what I think: godfather This method actually makes the series much better. It is essentially godfather part 1 or 2 It’s better to combine them into one more coherent story than to use them alone. The first two films share a lot of thematic material, character development, and complex storylines anyway. It always seemed pointless to keep them apart.;under consideration godfather The entire project is now one, so everything flows more smoothly.
Coppola labeling decisions The Godfather: Part III as “”epilogue” is a very interesting statement that strongly speaks to the purpose of the film. It is not intended to be a grand, all-encompassing epic like Parts 1 and 2.rather a more constrained exploration of the characters after the main story. It’s much slower and less intense because it’s not trying to accomplish the same purpose. There are still problems with this movie that can’t be ignored, but when you think about it this way, the existence of this project makes more sense.
‘The Godfather’ is not a trilogy, so it is unlikely that a fourth movie will be made.
the story is already complete
Director Coppola hasn’t talked about the subject for a while, but there was some discussion in the 1990s about the possibility of a fourth film. godfather Although it was made into a film, the project ultimately did not move forward. It was considered unnecessary, and the poor reception of the third film may have dissuaded the studio from making such a major effort. In the years that followed, Audiences are debating whether a fourth movie is a good ideabut Coppola’s stance seems to dispel that idea. godfather 4.
For Coppola, it didn’t make sense to continue the story even though it has been completed for over 30 years. Especially if Parts 2 and 3 were never considered “sequels” in the first place.
If it was originally intended to be a single story and the epilogue is already complete, there is nothing more to add to the project. For Coppola, it didn’t make sense to continue the story even though it has been completed for over 30 years. Especially if Parts 2 and 3 were never considered “sequels” in the first place. godfather This is a true work of art, a masterpiece that should not be expanded upon for its own sake.